Grounded theory methods have earned their place as a standard social research method and have influenced researchers from varied disciplines and professions. Yet grounded theory continues to be a misunderstood method, although many researchers purport to use it. Qualitative researchers often claim to conduct grounded theory studies without fully understanding or adopting its distinctive guidelines.
They may employ one or two of the strategies or mistake qualitative analysis for grounded theory. Conversely, other researchers employ grounded theory methods in reductionist, mechanistic ways. Neither approach embodies the flexible yet systematic mode of inquiry, directed but open-ended analysis, and imaginative theorizing from empirical data that grounded theory methods can foster.
Subsequently, the potential of grounded theory methods for generating middle-range theory has not been fully realized. To read the complete entry, click here: To access this article you must have a Temple University AccessNet account. If you are not affliated with Temple University, use the citation below to find the article at a library to which you have access.
See all library locations. Grounded Theory What is it? Search this Guide Search. Selecting the best research method allows you to successfully answer a research question or test a hypothesis. Missteps at the onset of the research process may derail an otherwise promising study. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative methods will help you make a better decision.
Both methods are quite useful depending on the type of study. Some dissertations and research studies take a mixed method approach, which incorporates qualitative and quantitative methods in different phases to obtain a broader perspective.
You may be very familiar with quantitative research from your science classes where you learned and practiced using the scientific method. A problem or question is examined by deductively forming a hypothesis derived from theory. Controlled, objective testing and experimentation ultimately supports or rejects your hypotheses.
Each step is standardized to reduce bias when collecting and analyzing data. A big advantage of this approach is that the results are valid, reliable and generalizable to a larger population. Quantitative research is advantageous for studies that involve numbers, such as measuring achievement gaps between different groups of students or assessing the effectiveness of a new blood pressure medication.
While quantitative research methods work well in the laboratory under tightly controlled conditions, measuring phenomena like human behavior in natural settings is trickier. Survey instruments are vulnerable to errors such as mistakes in measurement and flawed sampling techniques. Another disadvantage is that quantitative research involves numbers, but some topics are too difficult to quantify in numbers. For example, constructing an effective survey with closed-ended questions about how people fall in love would be difficult.
Qualitative research is often used to conduct social and behavioral studies because human interactions are more complex than molecular reactions in a beaker. Subjectivity, nonrandom sampling and small sample size distinguishes qualitative research from quantitative research. A big advantage of qualitative research is the ability to deeply probe and obtain rich descriptive data about social phenomena through structured interviews, cultural immersion, case studies and observation, for instance.
Examples include ethnography, narratives and grounded theory. Qualitative studies often take more time to complete due to the pain staking nature of gathering and analyzing field notes, transcribing interviews, identifying themes and studying photographs, for instance. Studies are not easily replicable or generalizable to the general population.
Advantages of Qualitative Research • Issues and subjects covered can be evaluated in depth and in detail. • Interviews are not limited to particular questions and can be redirected or guided by researchers • The direction and framework of research can be revised quickly as soon as fresh information • The data in qualitative research .
The advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research are quite unique. On one hand, you have the perspective of the data that is being collected. On the other hand, you have the techniques of the data collector and their own unique observations that can alter the information in subtle ways.
Selecting the best research method allows you to successfully answer a research question or test a hypothesis. Missteps at the onset of the research process may derail an otherwise promising study. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative methods will help you make a. Learn about the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative research and how and when to use it versus qualitative methods in market research. Learn about the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative research and how and when to use it versus qualitative methods in market research.
In qualitative research, the methods most commonly used are; qualitative case study, ethnography, content analysis and action research. There are many advantages and disadvantages of using a qualitative research when investigating our social world. The advantages of qualitative research revolve around the use of small groups and the ability to go more in-depth into the human emotions. The data is more comprehensive and gives the researcher a closer look at how and why .