This is because of the power they were believed to have after they were given the go- ahead to possess the firearms. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means. The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army. It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army.
The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention. This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed. This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves.
The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion. The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously.
When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government. However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions. For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people.
If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not. In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people.
People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun. Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence.
For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence. Related to this subject, a study conducted in has shown that out of the million small arms distributed globally, a percentage of 75 were purchased by civilians which means million guns. Then, out of this sum, USA population accounted for million.
As an international general law, civilians are allowed to hold firearms only if they get legal permission from authorities. In order to obtain this license, future owners have to prove that they know how to use a gun and they are familiar with the legislation. Furthermore, all arms must be registered with local authorities.
President Barak Obama has spoken about gun control and stated that accidents and crimes can be avoided if a set of principles are be applied.
Studies have shown that five women per day are killed by gun fires in America. Even more, there have been reported a large number of cases where children under 6 years old accidently kill themselves or others with firearms. In our case, you write about the images, sounds, or even smells you can associate with the total absence of individually possessed firearms or with their overwhelming amounts.
Definition gun control essay. A definition essay is set to define the notion of its topic. In this case, you will talk about what a gun control is. It is not unlike an article in a dictionary. Compare and contrast gun control essay. A compare and contrast essay describes the differences and similarities between the two issues. In our case, you can — for example — talk about how different are the people of opposing standpoints on gun control. Cause and effect essay on gun control. A cause and effect essay takes a certain event existing or suggested and investigates its consequences.
Here, you can, for example, talk about what would total ban on individual firearm possession lead to. Narrative gun control essay. A narrative essay tells a story. Process gun control essay. A process essay basically talks about how to do something, how to reach point B from point A.
For example, your point A can be where the mass shootings are possible, and point B — where they are impossible. Argumentative gun control essay. An argumentative essay is where you convince your reader that your argument is valid. In this case, you substantiate your stand on gun control. Critical gun control essay. A critical essay discusses the advantages and disadvantages of its subject. You can discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a certain approach to gun control.
Expository essay on gun control. An expository essay sets out to describe the issue in its current state, without any evaluations. Here, you can talk about the current state of the gun control regulations. Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is where you have to convince an opponent that you are right.
For example, you can try and convince a pro gun control lobbyist that strict regulations are not the answer to a problem. Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays. So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control.
Usually, an exciting argumentative essay starts with a controversial topic that suggests two or more polar opinions on it. With gun control, it should not pose any problem. You do have to avoid any emotional language, but you still need to have your own argument on the issue.
Given the controversial nature of the topic, this should also pose no problem: The next thing you do is collect evidence to support your argument. This may include collecting evidence in support of the opposing argument for you to rebuke.
There is a lot of material on both sides of the argument, so even an extensive research for your gun control argumentative essay should not be too challenging. Once you have conducted your research, it is time to start writing. Just as any other essay, an argumentative essay on gun control comprises of three parts: In the introducing paragraph, you present your topic to the reader by giving some relevant background information and stating your standpoint on the issue in your thesis statement.
The main body of your essay will consist of three parts: In the conclusion of your gun control argumentative essay, you briefly re-state your standpoint and why it is the right one. Persuasive essays are largely similar to argumentative ones, so much that it may be difficult to pinpoint the difference at first.
This difference mainly lies in the ways by which you prove the rightness of your claim. Let us take a closer look at these ways. The commonly accepted classification suggests three main methods of persuasion: Logos employs logic to appeal to the reader's rationality. Pathos uses the irrational and appeals to emotion.
Gun control is a hot button issue, especially in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. It is also a polarizing issue, which means that it tends to divide people.
gun control research paper As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic. Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers.
Research Paper On Gun Control Gun control is officially called regulation of firearms and it refers to all laws related to the use of arms on a territory. These ones are related to several aspects like manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification and use of guns. Free Term Papers on Gun Control available at hlcss.ml, the largest free term paper community.
Running head: Deadly Consequence of Gun Control APA Format Word Count = 2, Deadly Consequence of Gun Control Policy Proposal Paper Deadly Consequence of Gun Control Gun control has been on the forefronts of debate since the ’s when there were some high profile shootings. Gun Control Will Not Reduce Crime - Introduction The implementation of gun control in the United states is a large problem as it will take away the 2nd Amendment rights and would also stop the ability of law abiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals who obtain guns illegally.