This seems like a fairly weak claim! He spends rather more time on archaeological confirmations of Biblical narrative, on the putative validity of the resurrection accounts, and on the argument from religious experience, including his own. There is little, therefore, in the way of rebuttal of argument in the debate as recorded; rather, each contributor makes his own assertions, supported by argument and evidence. Nonetheless, each of them makes interesting points in an accessible way, although the complete beginner in philosophy of religion would do well to consult a standard text eg The Existence of God , edited by John Hick for fuller statements of the arguments under discussion.
Both Moreland and Nielsen then spoke briefly in rebuttal of the major arguments of the opposition, and then again to close the case on each side. There follow transcripts of questions from the floor and the answers from the speakers. Some of the questions were quite subtle, and some interesting points were made — on both sides — in response.
The issues raised ranged across the fields of linguistics, religious experience, the possibility of various forms of personal survival after bodily death, cosmology and the evidence for agnosticism rather than atheism, with incidental matters arising en route.
The debate on ethics was briefer, and once again there was little rebuttal of argument in the main speeches. If life did not arise by chance, how did it arise? The universe is ordered by natural laws. Where did these laws come from and what purpose do they serve?
Philosophers agree that a transcendent Law Giver is the only plausible explanation for an objective moral standard. So, ask yourself if you believe in right and wrong and then ask yourself why. Who gave you your conscience? Why does it exist? People of every race, creed, color, and culture, both men and women, young and old, wise and foolish, from the educated to the ignorant, claim to have personally experienced something of the supernatural.
So what are we supposed to do with these prodigious accounts of divine healing, prophetic revelation, answered prayer, and other miraculous phenomena? Ignorance and imagination may have played a part to be sure, but is there something more?
If your curiosity has been piqued and you desire to look into this matter further, we recommend that you consider the world's assortment of so-called Holy Books. The image people have of God doesn't only stop at being our creator. Another problem which I found while reading Aquinas' article is that it doesn't explain Darwinian theories. Darwinians base their theory on evolution. Darwinians believe that God doesn't exist but that all living things have evolved through nature.
The idea of evolution and evolving from nature means that there could not have been a creator but that one molecule started the process of evolution.
This theory can't be actually be disputed in Aquinas' third way because he only uses the word God to mean creator. Darwinians could say that the first molecule could also be called "God" if people wished, although it wouldn't be the form of God Christians believe in.
In both theories, Aquinas' and Darwin's, infinite regression is used. Both of these theories lead to different ideas of where existing things came from. Aquinas third way has some small problems which can be argued by atheists and orthodox Christians. I agree with what Aquinas had to say in his third way to be true. I believe that it must be true because all things must have had a creator. While speaking to an Anglican pastor, I learned that he also agreed in Aquinas' theory because he was taught that the question would still remain of who created the molecule.
The question will always remain how did God evolve. I cannot answer this question but Aquinas' theory has helped me understand the process of living things and I is no longer doubt that God is infinite. Augustine to Nicholas of Cusa, The Free Press, Essay, term paper, research paper: Philosophy Essays See all college papers and term papers on Philosophy Essays. Need a different custom essay on Philosophy Essays? Buy a custom essay on Philosophy Essays. Need a custom research paper on Philosophy Essays?
Click here to buy a custom term paper. Other sample model essays: Richard Swinburne's "The Problem of Evil": God's Existence Philosophers have looked for ways to explain God's existence for centuries. One such argment that the believer must justify in This project shows if video game violence affects children.
Many children between the ages Do We Have Souls? On the question of 'Do we have souls' and 'Can they survive after death', this writer will attempt a reasoned explanation and defense of my views to this philosophica
Immanuel Kant claimed that the argument of ontology failed to prove it's self because something that does not exist has lots of love than one which currently exists. According to Thomas Aquinas's argument, it shows that it directly supports the concept that God exists in this concept of ontology.
Essay Does God Exist? St. Thomas Aquinas has written several important works. Some of them are: The Disputed Questions on the Power of God, Exposition of Dionysius on the Divine Names and Disputed Questions on Spiritual Creatures. Most of Aquinas's works .
Does God Exist? (Philosophy essay sample) Does God Exist? I. Introduction Philosophers are identified as high thinkers. The discipline itself highly regards ethics, logic, knowledge, and what thing exists and its essential natures. Naturally, when one is questioned regarding . One of the arguments that claim God does not exist bases its grounds on existence of instances of evil in the world. The underlying principle of such arguments is that if God existed, he would eliminate evil, and since there are various types of evil present in the world, God does not exist.
If, for example, I am already dedicated to the philosophical idea that nothing can exist outside of the natural realm (i.e. there can be no supernatural God), no . Does God Exist? essay - Philosophy. Buy best quality custom written Does God Exist? essay.